Report 2014-119 Summary - December 2014

City of Indio:

Although the City Complied With the Mello-Roos Act in Forming and Managing Community Facilities District No. 2004-3, It Should Do More to Address Inequities

HIGHLIGHTS

Our review of the disposition of bond proceeds for Community Facilities District No. 2004-3 (Terra Lago) highlighted the following:

  • The city of Indio (city) complied with requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Act) in forming Community Facilities District No. 2004-3 (Terra Lago), assigning and paying Terra Lago's development costs, and responding to a tax relief petition from residents.
  • The city created inequities between Terra Lago's two improvement areas.
    • It charged Terra Lago's Improvement Area Number 1 (Area 1) $2.6 million for water fees that will primarily benefit Improvement Area Number 2 (Area 2).
    • It paid $1.1 million for sewer infrastructure that solely benefits Area 2.
  • While the city has taken some steps to reduce the inequities, Area 1's bond debt still covers about $1.2 million of remaining costs benefitting Area 2.

RESULTS IN BRIEF

The city of Indio (city) complied with requirements of the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982 (Act) in forming Community Facilities District No. 2004-3 (Terra Lago), assigning and paying Terra Lago's development costs, and responding to a tax relief petition from residents. It also constructed facilities as specified in Terra Lago's formation documents. However, it created inequities when it charged Terra Lago's Improvement Area Number 1 (Area 1) $2.6 million for water fees that will primarily benefit Improvement Area Number 2 (Area 2) and when it paid $1.1 million for sewer infrastructure that solely benefits Area 2. As a result, Area 1 property owners are paying higher Mello-Roos special taxes. While this created inequity between the two areas, Area 1 and Terra Lago as a whole have benefitted from the constructed facilities.

The city's recent actions related to Terra Lago's Area 1 have partially addressed Area 1 residents' concerns that Area 2 unfairly benefited from bonds supported by Area 1. The city finalized an agreement with the new property developer for Area 2, which will pay $2 million to the city for use in retiring a portion of Area 1 bonds. This agreement was contingent on the city's elimination of any authority to levy special taxes on Area 2 property owners. While the city has thus taken some steps to reduce the inequities, Area 1's bond debt still covers about $1.2 million of remaining costs benefitting Area 2. Although the Act may not require it, we believe that the city should require Area 2 property owners to pay for their share of Terra Lago costs.

RECOMMENDATION

The city should shift a share of the water facilities cost borne by Area 1 to Area 2 residents in proportion to the benefits Area 2 residents receive from the facilities. To do so, it should impose through its Indio Water Authority a water fee on Area 2 residents and use the related revenues to reduce the bond debt of Area 1.

AGENCY COMMENTS

The city believes its actions have already significantly resolved the inequity between Area 1 and Area 2 and that our recommendation raises procedural and other legal issues that may be difficult to overcome. Nevertheless, it has agreed to further evaluate imposing the water fee that we recommend.


Report type

Report type
















© 2013, California State Auditor | Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Download Adobe PDF Reader