Report 2017-302 Recommendation 2 Responses
Report 2017-302: Judicial Council of California: It Needs to Follow Competitive Bidding Processes More Consistently and Establish Clear Guidance for Invoice Processing (Release Date: December 2017)
Recommendation #2 To: Judicial Council of California
To better align the judicial contracting manual with state requirements and to make certain that it receives the best value for services, the Judicial Council should update by March 2018 the judicial contracting manual's guidance on contract splitting and sole-source procurements to reflect the more specific definitions in SCM.
60-Day Agency Response
Judicial Council staff have shared the auditor's recommended updates with members of a working group comprised of procurement officials from various courts. The working group periodically considers potential revisions to the Judicial Branch Contracting Manual (JBCM). The working group discussed the auditor's recommendations regarding contract splitting and sole source procurements in its last meeting on January 17, 2018. Revised language in line with provisions in the State Contracting Manual were proposed, and Judicial Council staff anticipate these changes will be published with the next revision of the JBCM (potentially this spring). Judicial Council staff note, as stated in the original response to the audit, that this recommendation is one that Judicial Council staff cannot implement unilaterally, since proposed updates will require formal adoption by the Judicial Council.
- Estimated Completion Date: June 2018
- Response Date: February 2018
California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Pending
Agency responses received are posted verbatim.