Report 2016-130 Recommendation 15 Responses

Report 2016-130: The University of California Office of the President: It Failed to Disclose Tens of Millions in Surplus Funds, and Its Budget Practices Are Misleading (Release Date: April 2017)

Recommendation #15 To: University of California Board of Regents

To ensure that the Office of the President is engaging in a thorough review of its systemwide and administrative costs and implementing our recommendations, the regents should develop a contract for an independent third party that can assist the regents in monitoring implementation of the three-year corrective action plan for the Office of the President. The independent third party should have expertise in higher education, public administration, and public finance. Moreover, the independent third party should have complete access to the Office of the President's documentation and its staff so that it has sufficient and appropriate information to verify the Office of the President's actions. The independent third party should report to the regents on the Office of the President's progress, challenges, and barriers to success at least quarterly.

6-Month Agency Response

Sjoberg Evashenk Consulting, Inc. (SE) has been selected to serve as the independent third party to assist the Regents in monitoring the Office of the President's progress in implementing the recommendations from this audit. The contract with SE was executed on July 7, 2017. SE issued its initial report on its independent assessment of implementation plans in July 2017. Its second quarterly report was issued in October 2017.

  • Completion Date: July 2017
  • Response Date: October 2017

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Partially Implemented

At the July meeting, the regents announced that it hired Sjoberg Evashenk Consulting, Inc. (Sjoberg Evashenk) in response to this recommendation. The scope of work outlines requirements that align with our recommendation. Although the regents claim this recommendation is fully implemented, full implementation is pending the quarterly reporting from Sjoberg Evashenk to the regents.

Moreover, we are concerned because we found minimal evidence that Sjoberg Evashenk is independently verifying the Office of the President's implementation of our recommendations. In its formal reports and presentations to the regents, it has stated there are no potential issues at this time. However, we believe there were issues that Sjoberg Evashenk should have brought to the regents' attention such as the $12 million increase in multi-year commitment spending discussed in recommendation 5 and concerns with the employee benefit policies discussed in recommendation 12. Moving forward we hope that the regents clarify their expectations of its independent consultant to ensure the consultant is reviewing, verifying, and reporting on at-risk areas in the implementation of our recommendations.


60-Day Agency Response

The Regents conducted a request for proposal (RFP) process to identify an independent third party consultant that can assist in the planning and implementation of the recommendations from this audit. The RFP required that the consultant must have expertise in higher education, public administration, and public finance. A consultant has been selected and the contract is expected to be finalized shortly. The consultant will be supervised by and report directly to the Regents Compliance and Audit Committee. The consultant will report to the Compliance and Audit Committee on the Office of the President's progress, challenges, and barriers to success at least quarterly.

  • Estimated Completion Date: July 2017
  • Response Date: June 2017

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Partially Implemented

At the July meeting, the regents announced that it hired Sjoberg Evashenk Consulting, Inc. in response to this recommendation.The scope of work outlines requirements that align with our recommendation. Full implementation of this recommendation is pending the quarterly reporting from Sjoberg Evashenk Consulting, Inc. to the regents.


All Recommendations in 2016-130

Agency responses received are posted verbatim.