Report 2015-117 Recommendation 7 Responses

Report 2015-117: California Department of General Services' Real Estate Services Division: To Better Serve Its Client Agencies, It Needs to Track and Analyze Project Data and Improve Its Management Practices (Release Date: March 2016)

Recommendation #7 To: General Services, Department of

To ensure that client agencies are paying equitable rates, by December 2016 General Services should develop and implement a strategy for allocating its administrative costs equally among all the projects it completes for client agencies, including those portions outsourced to private firms.

Agency Response*

Beginning in FY 16-17, RESD's Project Management and Development Branch (PMDB) will charge a 1 percent Contract Administration Fee for all external contracts entered into for projects. In brief, to arrive at the 1 percent fee, PMDB identified the total amount paid to support those programs within DGS that work on PMDB contracts such as legal review and contract services. PMDB then estimated the percent of the services that directly supports its contracts to arrive at a contract administration cost to recover. Using historical averages, recent trends, and estimates for current year work, PMDB then estimated the total amount of externally contracted services the branch will likely enter into during the fiscal year.

In PMDB's evaluation of this methodology, by implementing the fee, the portion of PMDB's overhead fees specifically related to contracting out have been separated from its rate and applied only to those projects where consultants are utilized. Because of this separation, clients whose projects are designed in-house by DGS are not charged at all for overhead related to contracting for design services. The contracting overhead for the construction portion of the work, special consultants retained, CEQA, hazardous materials testing/abatement, etc. would still be charged to the project. Because the remaining administrative charges, such as non-billable management time, are included in PMDB's hourly rate, larger projects where more support is needed bear more of the overall cost burden than would smaller projects. PMDB's assessment is that this structure is entirely equitable.

  • Response Type†: 1-Year
  • Completion Date: July 2016
  • Response Date: March 2017

California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Partially Implemented

Although General Services provided a spreadsheet displaying how it arrived at a 1 percent contract administration fee for external contracts entered into for projects, it has not yet conducted an analysis demonstrating that, by charging this fee, administrative costs are now equitably distributed among all of the projects it completes for client agencies, including those portions outsourced to private firms. Until such an analysis is completed, we will continue to assess this recommendation as partially implemented.

  • Auditee did not substantiate its claim of full implementation

Agency Response*

Beginning in FY 16-17, RESD's Project Management and Development Branch (PMDB) will charge a 1 percent Contract Administration Fee for all external contracts entered into for projects. In brief, to arrive at the 1 percent fee, PMDB identified the total amount paid to support those programs within DGS that work on PMDB contracts such as legal review and contract services. PMDB then estimated the percent of the services that directly supports its contracts to arrive at a contract administration cost to recover. Using historical averages, recent trends, and estimates for current year work, PMDB then estimated the total amount of externally contracted services the branch will likely enter into during the fiscal year.

  • Response Type†: 6-Month
  • Completion Date: July 2016
  • Response Date: September 2016

California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Partially Implemented

Although General Services provided a spreadsheet displaying how it arrived at a 1 percent contract administration fee for external contracts entered into for projects, it has not yet conducted an analysis demonstrating that, by charging this fee, administrative costs are now equitably distributed among all of the projects it completes for client agencies, including those portions outsourced to private firms. Until such an analysis is completed, we will continue to assess this recommendation as partially implemented.

  • Auditee did not substantiate its claim of full implementation

Agency Response*

By December 2016, DGS will complete an analysis of the effect of allocating administrative costs to RESD's architectural and engineering and construction contracts. The results of that analysis will, in part, inform any strategy or decision related to administrative costs.

  • Response Type†: 60-Day
  • Estimated Completion Date: December 2016
  • Response Date: May 2016

California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Pending


All Recommendations in 2015-117

†Response Type refers to the interval in which the auditee is providing the State Auditor with their status in implementing recommendations made in an audit report. Auditees must submit a response regarding their progress in implementing recommendations from our reports at three intervals from the release of the report: 60 days, six months, and one year or subsequent to one year.

*Agency responses received after June 2013 are posted verbatim.


Report type

Report type
















© 2013, California State Auditor | Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Download Adobe PDF Reader