Report 2015-102 Recommendation 10 Responses

Report 2015-102: Central Basin Municipal Water District: Its Board of Directors Has Failed to Provide the Leadership Necessary for It to Effectively Fulfill Its Responsibilities (Release Date: December 2015)

Recommendation #10 To: Central Basin Municipal Water District

To make better use of the funds it spends on services, the district should amend its administrative code by June 2016 to limit its sole-source contracts to emergency circumstances and circumstances in which only one vendor can meet the district's needs. Further, before executing any sole-source contracts, the district should require written justification demonstrating the reasons for not competitively bidding the services. The justification should include the background of the purchase, a description of the vendor's uniqueness, an explanation of the consequences of not purchasing from the vendor, market research to substantiate a lack of competition, and an analysis of pricing and alternatives.

6-Month Agency Response

A justification memo template outlining the requirements per the State Audit has been created and implemented as of December 1, 2015.

Administrative Code Part 5: Procurement Policy was revised to include the State Audit recommendations and was approved and adopted by the Board of Directors on March 28, 2016.

  • Completion Date: April 2016
  • Response Date: June 2016

California State Auditor's Assessment of 6-Month Status: Fully Implemented


60-Day Agency Response

A justification memo template outlining the requirements per the State Audit has been created and implemented as of December 1, 2015. Administrative Code Part 5: Procurement Policy is currently being revised to include State Audit recommendations and will be presented to the Board of Directors in March 2016 for adoption.

  • Estimated Completion Date: April 2016
  • Response Date: January 2016

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Partially Implemented

As the district notes, it developed a memo template for justifying sole source contracts that includes the background of the purchase, a description of the vendor's uniqueness, a discussion of the consequences of not making the sole source procurement, and an analysis of pricing and alternatives. However, the district has not yet modified its policies but stated it anticipates doing so in March 2016. For this reason, the recommendation is partially implemented.


All Recommendations in 2015-102

Agency responses received are posted verbatim.


Report type

Report type
















© 2013, California State Auditor | Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Download Adobe PDF Reader