To ensure that all appropriate redemption payments are identified and made to the beverage program, CalRecycle should do the following:
- Contract with the California Board of Equalization (Equalization) to determine the feasibility and cost of transferring its revenue collections duties and audit reviews to Equalization.
- Should CalRecycle find that it is feasible and cost effective, it should pursue legislative changes that enable Equalization to collect revenues for the beverage program at the point-of-sale and remit the money to the beverage program.
A feasibility study and cost estimate was completed by Equalization in November 2015 to determine the feasibility and cost of transferring CalRecycle's revenue collection and audit duties to Equalization. For collection of revenue alone, the study estimated an annual increased cost to CalRecycle of $45 million and 514.2 PY's. CalRecycle would still be responsible for any administration costs and activities beyond collection. Based on the increased cost to the Fund, CalRecycle has determined that while technically feasible it is not cost effective to have BOE collect revenue at point of sale locations at this time.
CalRecycle has entered into an agreement with Equalization to determine feasibility and cost of transferring its revenue collections duties and audit reviews to Equalization.
Meeting has been scheduled with BOE on May 12th to explore executing an interagency agreement to address recommendations in the findings. According to BOE there may need to be several meetings just to identify the scope of work and resources needed.
December 10, 2104 submitted a letter to Board of Equalization Chairman Jerome Horton.
If BOE agrees to proceed with a feasibility assessment, and the department in consultation with the board finds it is practical and cost effective, then an interagency agreement can be pursued. An ultimate determination of BOE's role in collecting CRV revenue will be informed by this assessment. Final determinations must be evaluated in the context of cost effectiveness and programmatic efficiency.
†Response Type refers to the interval in which the auditee is providing the State Auditor with their status in implementing recommendations made in an audit report. Auditees must submit a response regarding their progress in implementing recommendations from our reports at three intervals from the release of the report: 60 days, six months, and one year or subsequent to one year.
*Agency responses received after June 2013 are posted verbatim.