To ensure that the providers receive reimbursement for only valid services, Health Care Services should immediately ensure that Sacramento County strengthens its provider contract monitoring process, including tracking provider deficiencies and conducting follow-up visits to providers.
DHCS conducted a county monitoring on-site review on October 28-30, 2014 which included a thorough review of Sacramento County's provider monitoring process. The Department's report documented the county's deficiencies and required the county to submit a Corrective Action Plan (CAP). DHCS received the CAP in March 2015 and has been providing on-going technical assistance to county personnel to improve their monitoring tools, monitoring procedures, and sub-contractor CAP process. Sacramento County is scheduled for FY 15-16 on-site monitoring review in October 2015 to ensure implementation of their CAP and adherence to the State County contract.
DHCS provided a copy of the corrective action plans that it issued to Sacramento County in response to DHCS' SAPT Block Grant and State-County Contract Compliance review. DHCS provided a copy of Sacramento County's subsequent status update that describes the county's implementation of those corrective action plans, which would address deficiencies identified within the county's contract monitoring process
DHCS County Monitors conducted their site review October 28-30, 2014 which included a thorough review of Sacramento County's provider monitoring process.
Although Health Care Services indicated that it has fully implemented this recommendation, it did not provide us documentation to support its claim.
Several questions requiring documentation that demonstrates County provider monitoring procedures including follow up with providers have been added to the 14/15 County Monitoring Instrument (attached and beginning on page 38). The review of Sacramento County will be conducted in October 2014. As a component of this review, the County's provider contract monitoring process will be reviewed with a focus on their tracking of provider deficiencies and conducting follow up provider visits.
We agree that it has adjusted the county monitoring instrument as indicated; however, Health Care Services has not yet implemented this recommendation.
†Response Type refers to the interval in which the auditee is providing the State Auditor with their status in implementing recommendations made in an audit report. Auditees must submit a response regarding their progress in implementing recommendations from our reports at three intervals from the release of the report: 60 days, six months, and one year or subsequent to one year.
*Agency responses received after June 2013 are posted verbatim.