Report 2011-118/2011-613 Recommendation 5 Responses

Report 2011-118/2011-613: Conduit Bond Issuers: Issuers Complied With Key Bond Requirements, but Two Joint Powers Authorities' Compensation Models Raise Conflict-of-Interest Concerns (Release Date: August 2012)

Recommendation #5 To: Municipal Finance Authority, California

Municipal Finance should follow its July 2012 policy that describes how it will select contractors and periodically review existing contractors' services and prices to ensure the public funds it oversees are used effectively.

60-Day Agency Response

In July 2012 Municipal Finance's board compared Sierra Management's services and prices to other conduit bond issuers and concluded that it is receiving the best value for the public funds it oversees. Municipal Finance also sought competitive bids for issuer/special counsel services in November 2012, which it stated was a result of its review of the services it was receiving. Municipal Finance affirmed that it will continue to follow its July 2012 policy, stating that for any engagement for professional services with a duration of at least one year, its board will conduct a review on a periodic basis to assess and evaluate the performance of the service provider. It added that it expects to conduct a review on an annual basis each January. (See 2013-406, p. 33)

  • Response Date: November 2012

California State Auditor's Assessment of 60-Day Status: Fully Implemented


All Recommendations in 2011-118/2011-613

Agency responses received after June 2013 are posted verbatim.


Report type

Report type
















© 2013, California State Auditor | Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Download Adobe PDF Reader