Report 2009-109 Recommendation 41 Responses

Report 2009-109: Sacramento and Marin Superior Courts: Both Courts Need to Ensure That Family Court Appointees Have Necessary Qualifications, Improve Administrative Policies and Procedures, and Comply With Laws and Rules (Release Date: January 2011)

Recommendation #41 To: Superior Court of California, County of Sacramento

To clearly identify its process for registering complaints about private evaluators, the Sacramento Superior Court should make the necessary corrections to its 2012 local rules to add the complaint procedures that were omitted in error.

Agency Response*

The Sacramento Superior Court adopted a local rule related to the complaint process for private mediators and evaluators. The local rule became effective on January 1, 2012. (See 2013-406, p. 161)

  • Response Type†: 1-Year
  • Response Date: December 2012

California State Auditor's Assessment of Status: Fully Implemented


All Recommendations in 2009-109

†Response Type refers to the interval in which the auditee is providing the State Auditor with their status in implementing recommendations made in an audit report. Auditees must submit a response regarding their progress in implementing recommendations from our reports at three intervals from the release of the report: 60 days, six months, and one year or subsequent to one year.

*Agency responses received after June 2013 are posted verbatim.


Report type

Report type
















© 2013, California State Auditor | Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Download Adobe PDF Reader