Report 2009-109 Recommendation 39 Responses
Report 2009-109: Sacramento and Marin Superior Courts: Both Courts Need to Ensure That Family Court Appointees Have Necessary Qualifications, Improve Administrative Policies and Procedures, and Comply With Laws and Rules (Release Date: January 2011)
Recommendation #39 To: Superior Court of California, County of Marin
The Marin Superior Court should make certain that for future complaints it may receive, the court follows the steps stated in its process for registering complaints about evaluators.
1-Year Agency Response
The Marin Superior Court developed an evaluator complaint tracking form and stated that its human resources manager will complete the form while overseeing the investigation of the complaint, attach the form to the written complaint along with the evaluator’s written response and the written response from the other party if one is provided, and retain the form in the FCS complaint file for private evaluators. (See 2013-406, p. 160)
- Response Date: December 2012
California State Auditor's Assessment of 1-Year Status: Fully Implemented
Agency responses received after June 2013 are posted verbatim.